The Council's conclusions.
explanation given of the defendant glim
The al
Jafree which he cam
WBL his small salay abiliti
Suma g $500
a large remittance have is that money by gambling at Macao
of this defence is the money that Whe it is family clear derivar from brits: if it is not the question is whether gambler anget to the amplayed y trust.
I think that an off which the Comet wanted Kalitual D in praction of the poned the harps sufficient to justify dismissal & accordingly telegraphe, as proposed
BY 21112 ACC 31 Rent 31s Ward ark could propert
As regards charge (a) I don't think that the an instated case of lending money bring C officers under the operation of Regs 76d76141 And the tatuer cst.
as regards change (b) I don't see that in the booted cam supporting the charge. be held the Endeine.
To my mind the wish turpicion fact Ward was in possession of funds which he ス could not have saved from his salary, for the results of successful gambling.
The Chamare 133 notoruinly adapts in the art of concocting false Wardhaheen shown the alohas harried them then ཐུན་ the active offer Chanta Ъ ит fter being repeatedly fine, dass Here wobe a priori ground for dubbrming he was the victim of a conspirang.
enggest anything f But her tomot the kind, to the whole Какайт ho стрый I think best has been shown für Meduces Dr. A Referral & 2/1
This is a most unsatisfaction I can find onlyone instance in which a chinaman Came forward & stated that he had given monly I apper WBL (fee (017) oferuise to ward.
In the other cases entres in pand the books gmonly explained to be entres gmoney given to ward taken as wee evidence against him, o Statements that some me be had frow were admitted. him money
It is obvious that such evidence ought
the Council's conclusions.
explanation given of the defendant glim
h
The al
квита addition to making
Jafree which
which he cam
WBL
his small salay
abiliti
へ
Suma
g $500
L
a large remittance have is that
money by gambling at Macao
le
༣༠ཡི་།..
of
this defence is
the
money
that
کلس
Whe
it is family clear derivar from brits: if
it is not the question is whether gambler anget to the amplayed
y trust.
з
I think that an off
which the Comet wanted
Kalitual
D
in
ር.
praction
of the
poned
the harps
sufficient to justify dismissal &
accordingly telegraphe, as proposed
BY
21112
ACC 31
Rent 31s
Ward ark
could propert
As regards charge (a) I don't think that the an
instated case of lending money
bring
C
officers under the operation of
Regs 76d76141
And
the tatuer
cst.
as regards change (b) I don't see that
in the booted cam
supporting the charge.
be held the Endeine.
To my mind the wish turpicion fact Ward
was in possession of funds which he
ス
could not have saved from his salary,
for
the
07
results of successful gambling.
The Chamare
133
notoruinly adapts in
the art of concocting false
Wardhaheen shown the
alohas harried them then
ཐུན་
the
active offer
Chanta
Ъ
ит
fter being repeatedly fine, dass Here wobe a priori ground for dubbrming he was the victim of a conspirang.
enggest anything f
But her
tomot
the kind, to the whole
Какайт
ho
стрый
I think best
has been shown für
Meduces
Dr.
A
Referral &
2/1
This is a most unsatisfaction
I can find onlyone instance in which
a chinaman
Came
forward & stated
that he had given monly
I apper
WBL
(fee (017)
oferuise
to ward.
In the other cases entres in
pand
the books gmonly explained to be entres gmoney given to ward
taken
as
wee
evidence against him, o Statements that some me be had frow were admitted.
him money
It is obvious that such evidence ought
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.